Career at the fate of turf
- amberdossenback
- Nov 30, 2022
- 2 min read
In the past weeks, there has been heavy conversation surrounding the controversy of artificial turf in football stadiums. While faux grass may look more appealing, athletes argue that the cons greatly outweigh its benefits. Playing on turf increases risk of injury and chemical ingestion, and players didn't sign up for ACL tears or PFAS exposure.
Jackson Thompson of The Insider further explains the history behind this idea, noting multiple significant injuries through the years as an apparent result of turf. Odell Beckham's non-contact injury during the 55th superbowl re-sparked the debate, leading to the creation of #Fliptheturf.


Athletes such as Nick Chubb, George Kittle, and Nick Bosa used social media to spread awareness of the dangers of turf. The petition is now nearing 29,000 signatures, although the NFL shows no signs of 'flipping the turf' entirely.
As mentioned earlier, the toxic chemicals produced by turf can increase per- and polyfluoroalkyl levels. High PFAS exposure can be associated with surging cholesterol, liver/fertility damage, hormone suppression, cancer, and more, according to CNN. Not only are players at risk for physical injuries, they are also jeopardizing their internal health for years to come beyond the field.
In understanding the disadvantages of turf, one might wonder why the NFL is not prioritizing construction in half their stadiums (Yes, HALF). With the help of Global Sports Matter, one can infer the organization's benefit of providing its stadiums with artificial grass. The chart below shows the cost analysis comparison that commissioners likely face each year.

Although this graphic shows the favorability of turf in terms of economics, it does not take into consideration the well being of players and staff that are present on the field.
The NFL Players Association President JC Tretter has since come to recognize the problems with faux grass with help from statistics and stories. As of this month, the NFL conducted research to conclude that slit-film turf is to be banned from stadiums. With only one type of turf being banned, this leaves 7 fields covered in artificial grass for seasons to come.

As a fan of the game with admiration for the players, I can only hope to see no further injuries, or health conditions arise as a result of turf. Real grass provides less risk to the players in general, allowing them to play the game as it was meant to be played.

Comments